Видео

Made easy indeed, thank you very much

5:54 I don’t understand why you divide it, is there a reason that lead to you deciding to divide it to derive a formula for ideal velocity? Sorry if that’s a stupid question.

ps this is in the module 8 playlist but the dp #8.1.4 account for the production of emission and absorption spectra and compare these with a continuous black body spectrum isnt

Thks

thanks, massive help

How do I know an ethyl from methyl

underrated channel

practicing for year 11! hoping to get 97 atar

love your resources, thank you so much guys!

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!! I'VE BEEN TRYING TO FIND CLEAR TUTORIALS ON THIS FOR AGES!!!

good stuff man

❤❤With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Is it the same as 1,2 dimethanol?

Thank you 😊😊😊

Why did you put 1-bromopropane? In the first example you put methylpropane why didn't you also add 1methylpropane?

Newton never stated corpuscles have mass instead he suggested they were massless.

1:11 alpa pharticles?

way too good

The worst topic in chemistry!

very helpful! thanks!

probably the most succinct explanation of this topic! thanks!

Why is the number of protons in the example of Methyl Acetate shown as 1.00 under both peaks? Shouldn't it be 3?

1887 Of 0 Drift 1913 Yet Shift Was, Achieved

Yet Wave, Does Indicate Exactly A Medium Exist

im gonna cream

Thank you very much for these videos. I have weak physics teacher who cant teach, so your videos are a life saver

Thank you

good video and great explanation

so im cooked for this…🥰

why doesn't this wave/doppler principle apply to the other wave, the light wave?

I have a test tomorrow 🥲

Shouldn't the mirror be pushed back by 1/4 of wave length? So the total distance it will travel is 1/2 wave length longer than the other one.

If protons of the paraffin are emitted doesn't that mean the elemental structure of the paraffin has changed? Which takes a lot more energy than this. Im so confused.

how does a changing magnetic field lead to an accelerating charge???

You have quickly become the best science channel on the internet. Much better than science channels with millions of subscribers. Hope you get discovered quicker.

Excellent work. I'll use that in my classes.

its a fake isomer

damn u made it easy

so if there are broad lines is there a way to distinguish wether its spinning fast or if its just dense?

Great video

Is that all you took from this … my light cone says event E is only relative too the observer

1,2,2-bromodimethylbutane, but this is easier.

well explained sir

The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *RUclips presentation of above arguments: ruclips.net/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/видео.html <ruclips.net/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/видео.html> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

and in an Open system what is the construct, Energy?

thank you for the clear explanation:) It really helps me:) I do apologize before, but would you mind inform me about the literature used in this video? I need to learn more about this material due to my thesis:))

im cooked

4:07 I thought the moderated school assessment mark still maintained the “mark gap” between each student based on raw school assessment mark?? Eg. In this instance the gap between the 3 students is 10 marks. So I would have thought Annie’s School Assessment Mark would be 85 and Bob’s 75, which maintains the mark gap consequently based on school assessment mark - or Raw/unmoderated or whatever it is?